With Coke, Nike, Hollywood films and fast food, the US has many exports.

As a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood – the oldest, largest and most trusted reproductive health provider in the US – I have one key message to Australians during my visit here: beware we don’t export the war that is currently being waged on women in my country.

[…]

I encourage you to be watchful of policies in Australia that emulate those in America. The war on women is not an import the women of your country want or deserve.

Leola Reis, “America’s war on women,” The Drum, June 8, 2012

Lord knows I love Americans and think Planned Parenthood — of which Reis is vice president of external affairs — does invaluable work, but this is a rather repellent and narcissistic rhetoric on display here. Omitted by the ellipsis is an entire column explicating the basic points of the “war on women” in America, and, certainly, this is something I think Australians should be interested in and informed about. But Reis’s argument doesn’t treat Australia as its own country with its own politics and its own public debates. We’re just a mass she can use to decry things she doesn’t like about her own country. Don’t emulate America on gender issues, she warns Australia, but doesn’t even consider that Australian society has its own gender issues. For instance, Reis talks about American politicians trying to restrict access to abortion, but is apparently entirely unaware of the tenuous legality of abortion in most Australian states, or that Roe v Wade has given the United States a rhetorical and legal basis for pro-choice activism that isn’t available in Australia.

I understand, too, that a writer feels compelled to relate an issue to a local audience. Telling that audience “Don’t do what we do” without reference to the concerns of that foreign audience is not how you do that. Leola Reis, we are a nation — one as complex and real and fully formed as your own. We are not a confession booth where you can atone for your country’s sins.

(via screwrocknroll)

I think this is part of where my fellow US lefties lose sight of the forest for the trees and thus find themselves on the losing end of their own rhetorical and emotional battle. One of the things I like to beat home about the weakness of our political positions and temperament is that quite often, the rhetoric used to advocate for a position is often more about the speaker than why the policy is beneficial to a larger group.

In this context, Reis’ warning becomes a treatise to solipsism: these are the awful things my country is doing to restrict women’s rights (and they are bad, believe me!) and the good fight Planned Parenthood has against them, but completely mistakes her audience, presuming it does not have its own battle in the same arena under different circumstances. Ultimately, these “don’t be like us” missives serve only to highlight how “good” the writer or speaker is rather than expand the message to an audience distinct from one’s own — and the intended message is lost in the fake atonement.

I mean, if you can’t frame your argument in an Australian publication for the audience most likely to read it, how well are you going to do when it comes to convincing people in your own society of the utility and necessity for expanded reproductive rights, never mind throwing overboard the canard that these are simply “women’s rights”?

…banal statements are given an appearance of profundity by means of the not un- formation.

George Orwell, Politics and the English Language (1946)

Now look here, George. Litotes are a distinct feature of Australian English and I’ll thank you to keep your imperialism to yourself.

(via screwrocknroll)

Required reading here. Best part is the translation from English to academese:

I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.

Objective considerations of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.

The disease continues unabated today in American writing.

Loading

Loading

Close
×

Loading

Loading

Close
×

Well this is a bit embarrassing

It appears that the requested content could not load or is not available anymore, however there's plenty more cool stuff to be found on our home page.

Close
×

Loading

Loading

Please wait while we load your content

The Third Shift A vagabond who's made his home in the Pacific Northwest.

Close
×